Sparks and Cinders

A octogenarian ponders aloud.

Pages

  • Home
  • Some Favorite Books

A welcome to readers

As a resident of this planet for more than four fifths of a century, I have enjoyed both successes and disappointments in a wide variety of vocations, avocations, and life experiences. This blog satisfies my desire to share some thoughts and observations--trenchant and prosaic--with those who are searching for diversions which are interesting, poignant and occasionally funny. I also plan to share recommendations about good/great movies I've watched and books and articles which I've found particularly mind-opening, entertaining, instructive. In addition, I can't pass up the opportunity to reflect publicly on how I am experiencing the so-called Golden Years. Write anytime:
markmarv2004@yahoo.com

Thursday, August 14, 2014

LATEST PET PEEVES: A COLLECTION

Unmuffled 2 cycle engines on lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf and dust blowers. Especially bad at nap time.

Prolonged horn blowing when a simple beep will do.

Heavy perfumed scent--man or woman, strong enough to leave an olfactory residue on your skin and clothing after a hug or in closed spaces, e.g., elevators, where the odor can linger for hours.

Thumping high volume bass speakers  in cars--especially at night and/or at stoplights.

Loud music (usually rap) played at high volume with car windows down.

Doctor instructs: "No food or drink for 12 hours" and then first thing next day :"Give me a urine sample."

People speaking loudly, walking around gesturing on cell phones in public places. Same for stalls in public restrooms (usually without the walking).

People who amble around stores talking animatedly with a mostly invisible over-the-ear mike and receiver--and come up next to you, look at you while talking, and you think they are talking to you and start to answer when you realize the embarrassing truth.

Loud television programs, with corporate or institutional advertising, played in an emergency room, doctor's office, or place where you can't get away from the noise or while you're trying to escape by reading.

Receptionists in the waiting room of a medical office who, in a loud voice, call patients with a "canned" message to remind them of an appointment the next day--while patients are sitting there worried about their own issues and test results.  These calls with a repetitive message are usually made in an "announcer's" voice," and delivered a sufficiently high volume that everyone in the waiting room hears who is being called and the nature of their complaint--so much for HIPPA guarantees.

People who stop and block pedestrian  traffic in a store's aisle, checkout line, or return line in order to use their phone or iPod for personal business.

People who block a cashier line while they scramble to take out a purse and hunt for money or coupons or count change. Usually these people have not bothered to hunt for or touch their purse until the cashier says "That'll be $52.80, please, and then the search begins.  What a shock! These people always seem a little surprised when they have to find their money even though they have been in lines like this hundreds of times in the past.

Clamshell packaging that is devised to prevent shoplifting by using large, ultra strength NASA quality plastic packages to protect little things.

You're walking along in a parking lot thinking about what to cook for dinner or the balance in your bank account when someone, far away across the lot, that you cannot see, activates the car's door lock--right next to you--no one else around-- causing the horn to blow unexpectedly. Heart arresting.

Accidentally rolling your mouse over an internet popup that presents you with no obvious way to exit.

Particularly unbearable are popups that come on line and shock your sensibilities with volume turned up unbearably loud. This is especially offensive when the ad precedes and is is totally irrelevant to (and demeans) the topic you're searching for--looking for Palestine/Israel Conflict and get Depends, Fiber Gummies or Ram Tough.

Foil covers that are adhered to cups of yogurt, applesauce and pudding, etc.with super glue. Tears repeatedly in strips when penetrated with a blade or fingernail.

Tabs too small to pinch that must be used to open a food or medical product.  Same with sealed medication bottles topped with industrial strength foil adhered with Super Glue. These difficulties are multiplied by age, time of night, and arthritic fingers.

Tabs that tear just as you begin to use them--an especially egregious problem with sardine tins and the like. The tabs are gone, how do I get inside?

Newspapers with vertical half page ads that cover part of the first page, including headlines, so you can't read the news without unfolding the whole  paper to remove half-page;  and/or newspapers containing small or slick/glossy inserts that fall out when you pick up the paper by the fold.

"Sealed for your Safety"--all containers. I saw following article about Tylenol bottles. Here's where it all began.

September 29, 2012
NPR Shop | NPR Social Media | Login | Register
NPR
FIND A STATION
  • home
  • news
  • arts & life
  • music
  • programs
  • listen
  • News >
  •  
  • Health
  • Twitter (4)
  • Facebook (10)
  • Share
  • Comments (4)

Why Tylenol Bottles Are Hard To Open

by TRICIA BOBEDATranscript
Thirty years ago this weekend, seven people died from ingesting Tylenol that had been poisoned. Since then, Johnson & Johnson has overhauled its packaging.
EnlargeiStockphoto.com
Thirty years ago this weekend, seven people died from ingesting Tylenol that had been poisoned. Since then, Johnson & Johnson has overhauled its packaging.
text size A A A
September 29, 2012 fromWBEZ
Opening a new package of Tylenol can take some effort. There's the cardboard packaging, plus the push-and-twist top and the safety seal.
It used to be a matter of just popping off a cap. Thirty years ago, seven people died in Chicago suburbs after taking poisoned Tylenol. Pharmacies pulled Tylenol off the shelf in a panic and the nation was in shock.
Richard Keyworth was a firefighter in the area and one of the first investigators in the Tylenol murders case. He says investigators quickly realized the poison was hidden in bottles of Tylenol, but no one knew how it got there or how many people were at risk.
"There was a feeling of helplessness, and Tylenol was the medication for everything," he says. "If you can't trust that, what can you trust?"
Investigators said the poison was likely slipped into bottles after they were already on store shelves. Johnson & Johnson then recalled about $100 million worth of Tylenol.
No one was ever charged with the crime. The FBI has reopened the cold case and investigators are using new technology to search for DNA evidence.
Mark Mandell was finishing up pharmacy school in Chicago when the Tylenol murder story broke in 1982. He says for a while, people were scared to take just about any medication.

Related NPR Stories

No more tears, and no more quaternium-15 for Johnson's Baby Shampoo.

shots - health blog

Johnson & Johnson Pledges To Purge Controversial Chemicals

More than a half-million bottles of Tylenol for babies have been recalled because of complaints about a new system for getting the dose right. The doughnut-like receptacle for the syringe seen in the neck of the bottle can get pushed down into the liquid medicine.

shots - health blog

Johnson & Johnson Recalls Infants' Tylenol That's Too Hard To Use

"You really had to try to reassure people, but how confident were you as an individual? Because no one knew. It was unknown who the attacker was, what the motive was, and ... it was out there," he says.
The deaths spurred new regulations on over-the-counter drug packaging. The FDA and Congress quickly passed a federal anti-tampering law.
Mandell says there shouldn't be any confusion now about how to handle a product with a broken seal.
"It's sort of in your face. You know, if anything appears wrong, don't use it," he says.
Over time, Tylenol bounced back to its status as a household name. O.C. Ferrell, a marketing ethics professor at the University of New Mexico, says the way Johnson & Johnson handled the Tylenol case is still considered textbook crisis management.
"If you're a really good company, like they were in making this recall, you've got to say, 'If we don't protect the brand name and our integrity of our reputation, then nothing will matter in the long run,' " he says.
Now, for many Tylenol users, perhaps the biggest thing they worry about is getting the bottle open.
Here, thy this wonderful website:http://www.buzzfeed.com/hannahjewell/things-that-will-irritate-you-more-than-they-should?bffb&utm_term=4ldqpgp
Shots - Health Blog: The NPR Health Blog
  • Holy Bat Virus! Genome Hints At Origin Of SARS-Like Virus
  • For Best Toilet Health: Squat Or Sit?
more
NPR thanks our sponsors
Become an NPR Sponsor

most viewed

  1. Searching For Jimmy Hoffa
  2. For Best Toilet Health: Squat Or Sit?
  3. 'Listening In' To JFK's Secret White House Recordings
  4. Why Tylenol Bottles Are Hard To Open
From Our Partner: Kaiser Health News
  • Obama, Romney Spar Over Medicare, Health Reform Policies
  • Health Policies Bubble Up In House And Senate Races
  • Political Cartoon: 'The Introduction'
more

Weekend Edition on Facebook

Fans get our favorite stories, exclusive videos and real-time messages while we're on the air.
join us

Americandy: Sweet Land Of Liberty

Americandy: Sweet Land Of Liberty
Melisa Goh/NPR
We're taking a cross-country tour of candies from around the U.S., sampling hometown sweets that deliver a nostalgic sugar rush.

latest stories 

  • Maine's Needhams: A Sweet Treat Of Earthy Potatoes MPBN
  • Valomilks: A Sweet Treat That Runs Down Your Chin KPR
  • Chukar Cherries: A Year-Round Taste Of Summer N3

@nprscottsimon On Twitter

  • Now, AJ Jacobs on debate lore. Was "You're no Jack Kennedy!" an ad-lib, or did Dan Quayle walk into verbal trap?2 minutes ago
  • @Mary__Malone I believe media outlets that sell campaign ads do very well indeed. Some slight increase in Cleve hotels, too.3 minutes ago
  • Up ahead:lotsa campaign stuff, just before next week's debates.13 minutes ago
Follow @nprscottsimon on Twitter.

@nprweekend On Twitter

  • Presidential candidates scramble to secure votes in #Ohio, which has particularly high stakes for @MittRomney: http://t.co/4pbIqViI11 minutes ago
  • Leonard Bernstein's 1963 symphony "Kaddish" explores a crisis of personal faith after the loss of President Kennedy: http://t.co/wGULDTCW20 minutes ago
  • "I think it's a ghastly accident," British actor Damian Lewis says of his knack for playing Americans in uniform: http://t.co/PIXWj26A26 minutes ago
  • Fox apologizes when a live feed of a car chase takes an unexpected turn: http://t.co/V5fdokBw35 minutes ago
Follow @nprweekend on Twitter.

npr always on

  • Newsletters
  • Podcasts
  • Mobile
  • RSS Feeds
  • Widgets
  • API
  • Radio

news

  • U.S.
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Science
  • Health
  • Sports

arts & life

  • Books
  • Movies
  • Pop Culture
  • Food
  • Performing Arts
  • Games & Humor

music

  • Music Articles
  • Music Videos
  • NPR Music Radio
  • Browse Genres
  • Browse Artists A-Z
  • All Songs Considered
  • Alt.Latino
  • First Listen
  • Live In Concert
  • NPR Music Essentials
  • Marian McPartland'sPiano Jazz
  • The Thistle & Shamrock
  • World Cafe

programs a-z

  • All Things Considered
  • Ask Me Another
  • Cabinet of Wonders
  • Car Talk
  • The Diane Rehm Show
  • Fresh Air
  • Morning Edition
  • On The Media
  • On Point
  • Talk of the Nation
  • TED Radio Hour
  • Tell Me More
  • Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
  • Weekend EditionSaturday
  • Weekend Edition Sunday

listen

  • Hourly News
  • NPR Program Stream
  • Schedule
  • Find Station Streams

more

  • Multimedia
  • Columns
  • Blogs
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • NPR Ombudsman
  • StateImpact

about

  • This Is NPR
  • Support and Sponsor
  • Press Room
  • Careers
  • NPR Shop
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright 2012 NPR
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions
  • Corrections
  • Text-Only Site
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Our partner in public broadcasting pbs
CLOSE
Posted by markmarv2004 at 1:34 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Friday, July 4, 2014

MAKE A DIFFERENCE, ONE SOCCER BALL AT A TIME

Just signed up to donate a new design of soccer ball for kids to use anywhere.  What a great invention and idea.  Worth supporting. Make a real difference in the lives of kids with no access to regulation soccer balls or playing fields. It occurs to me that diverting the testosterone-fuelled energies of young men around the world into competitive sports is not a bad strategy for peacemakers.

http://www.oneworldfutbol.com/shop/one-world-futbol-give-one/
Posted by markmarv2004 at 10:02 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Saturday, June 28, 2014

MOYERS ON LAWRENCE OF ARABIA: YESTERDAY'S MESS REVISITED TODAY

The problems in the Middle East are not new.  The causes continue to be rooted in outside influences and interventions that have as their primary goal self-aggrantizement. Maybe the peoples of the area will now do violently for themselves what Lawrence tried to do peacefully almost 100 years ago.

This link leads to a < 5 minute explanation--with implications for all of us today.

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/24652-bill-moyers-essay-what-we-can-learn-from-lawrence-of-arabia
Posted by markmarv2004 at 12:36 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Friday, June 27, 2014

ABOUT TIME: A WORTHY INVENTION

I'm glad to see that some brainpower is being devoted to something other than video games and manufacturing artisanal booze.  Here's something that can really make a difference. Wonderful"feel good"presentation.

http://news.yahoo.com/katie-couric-one-world-futbol-223434918.html
Posted by markmarv2004 at 8:37 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Monday, June 23, 2014

THE TRAGEDY OF IRAQ IS AMERICA"S TRAJEDY

This morning I read the following article by Chris Hedges.  I was almost brought to tears by the truth of what I read.  Hedges gave my perspective some clarity, unfortunately. Consider the implications of colonialism as a national policy…driven by individual and corporate greed and hubris. It is with sadness that  I share it with you.

Truthdig

The Ghoulish Face of Empire

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ghoulish_face_of_empire_20140623/

Posted on Jun 22, 2014

By Chris Hedges

Anti-war protesters, wearing masks depicting former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, right, former U.S.  President George W. Bush, center, and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, pose for photographers.AP/Lefteris Pitarakis
The black-clad fighters of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, sweeping a collapsing army and terrified Iraqis before them as they advance toward Baghdad, reflect back to us the ghoulish face of American empire. They are the specters of the hundreds of thousands of people we murdered in our deluded quest to remake the Middle East. They are ghosts from the innumerable roadsides and villages where U.S. soldiers and Marines, jolted by explosions of improvised explosive devices, responded with indiscriminate fire. They are the risen remains of the dismembered Iraqis left behind by blasts of Hellfire and cruise missiles, howitzers, grenade launchers and drone strikes. They are the avengers of the gruesome torture and the sexual debasement that often came with being detained by American troops. They are the final answer to the collective humiliation of an occupied country, the logical outcome of Shock and Awe, the Frankenstein monster stitched together from the body parts we left scattered on the ground. They are what we get for the $4 trillion we wasted on the Iraq War. 

The language of violence engenders violence. The language of hate engenders hate. “I and the public know what all schoolchildren learn,” W.H. Audenwrote. “Those to whom evil is done do evil in return.” It is as old as the Bible.
There is no fight left in us. The war is over. We destroyed Iraq as a unified country. It will never be put back together. We are reduced—in what must be an act of divine justice decreed by the gods, whom we have discovered to our dismay are Islamic—to pleading with Iran for military assistance to shield the corrupt and despised U.S. protectorate led by Nouri al-Maliki. We are not, as we thought when we entered Iraq, the omnipotent superpower able in a swift and brutal stroke to bend a people to our will. We are something else. Fools and murderers. Blinded by hubris. Faded relics of the Cold War. And now, in the final act of the play, we are crawling away. Our empire is dying.
We should have heeded, while we had a chance, the wails of mothers and fathers. We should have listened to the cries of the wounded. We should have wept over the bodies of Iraqi children lined up in neat rows in the morgues. We should have honored grief so we could honor life. But the dance of death is intoxicating. Once it begins you whirl in an ecstatic frenzy. Death’s embrace, which feels at first like sexual lust, tightens and tightens until you suffocate. Now the music has stopped. All we have left are loss and pain.

And where are the voices of sanity? Why are the cheerleaders of slaughter, who have been wrong about Iraq since before the invasion, still urging us toward ruin? Why are those who destabilized Iraq and the region in the worst strategic blunder in American history still given a hearing? Why do we listen to simpletons and morons?
They bang their fists. They yell. They throw tantrums. They demand that the world conform to their childish vision. It is as if they have learned nothing from the 11 years of useless slaughter. As if they can dominate that which they never had the power to dominate.
I sat in a restaurant Thursday in Boston’s Kenmore Square with military historian Andrew Bacevich. You won’t hear his voice much on the airwaves. He is an apostate. He speaks of the world as it is, not the self-delusional world our empire builders expect it to be. He knows war with a painful intimacy, not only as a Vietnam combat veteran and a retired Army colonel but also as the father of a U.S. Army officer killed in a 2007 suicide bombing in Iraq.
“In the 1990s there was a considerable effort made in the military, but also in the larger community of national security experts scratching their heads and [asking] what are the implications of all this technology,” he said. “They conceived of something called the Revolution in Military Affairs—RMA. If you believed in the Revolution of Military Affairs you knew that nothing could stop the United States military when it engaged in a conflict. Victory was, for all practical purposes, a certainty. People like Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, and I expect Dick Cheney also, bought this hook, line and sinker. You put yourself in their shoes in the wake of 9/11. An attack comes out of Afghanistan, a country frankly nobody cares about, and you conceive of this grand strategy of trying to transform the Islamic world. Where are we going to start? We are going to start by attacking a country [Iraq]—we had it under surveillance and sanctions for the past decade—where there is a bona fide bad guy to make a moral case and where we are confident we can make short work of this adversary, a further demonstration that the American military cannot be stopped. They utterly and totally miscalculated. Iraq is falling apart. And many of these people, either in government or outside of government, who were proponents of the war are now advocating for a resumption of the American war. Not one of them is willing to acknowledge the extent of that military miscalculation. Once you acknowledge it, then the whole project of militarizing U.S. policy towards the Greater Middle East collapses.”
Bacevich blames the concentration of power into the hands of the executive branch for the debacle. He said that since the Kennedy administration “the incoming president and his team, it does not matter which party, see the permanent government as a problem. If we [the new officials] are going to get done what we want to get done we have to find ways to marginalize the permanent government. This has led to the centralization of authority in the White House and means decisions are made by a very small number of people. The consultation becomes increasingly informal, to the point it is not even documented.”
“I do not think we even know when the decision to go to war with Iraq was actually made,” Bacevich said. “There is no documented meeting where [President George W.] Bush sat down with how many people—six, 10, 25—and said, ‘Let’s vote.’ The decision kind of emerged and therefore was implemented. Why would you operate that way? You would operate that way if you viewed the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the CIA and the State Department as, in a sense, the enemy.”
“The invasion of Iraq was intended to be a catalyst,” he said. “It was supposed to be the catalyst that would enable us ... to change the region. It turned out to be the catalyst that resulted in destabilization. The big question of the moment is not what can we do or is there anything we can do to salvage Iraq. The question is to what degree have our actions resulted in this larger regional mayhem. And to the extent they have, isn’t it time to rethink fundamentally our expectations of what American power, and particularly American military power, can achieve?”
“We need to take a radically different course,” Bacevich said. “There is an analogy to be made with Great Britain in the wake of World War I. It was in World War I that Britain and France collaborated to dismantle the Ottoman Empire to create the new Middle East. While on the one hand there was an awareness that Britain was in decline, at the level where policy was made there was not a willingness to consider the implications of that fact. It took World War II to drive it home—that the [British] empire was doomed. I think that is where we are.”
Out of this decline, Bacevich said, is emerging a multipolar order. The United States will no longer be able to operate as an unchallenged superpower. But, he said, similar to the condition that existed as the British Empire took its last gasps, “there is very little willingness in Washington or in policy circles to take on board the implications multipolarity would call for in terms of adjusting our policy.”
The inability to adjust to our declining power means that the United States will continue to squander its resources, its money and its military.
“By squandering power we forfeit our influence because we look stupid and we bankrupt ourselves,” Bacevich said. “We will spend $4 trillion, not dollars spent in the moment but dollars we will have spent the last time the last Afghanistan veteran gets his last VA check. That money is gone forever. It is concealed because in the Bush administration’s confidence that victory would be easily won the government did not bother to mobilize the country or increase our taxes. We weaken ourselves economically. People complain about our crappy infrastructure. Give me $4 trillion and I probably could have fixed a couple of bridges. And we must never forget the human cost. Lives lost, lives damaged. And in these two wars [Afghanistan and Iraq] there does seem to be this increase in PTSD that we don’t know what to do about. It is a squandering of human capital.”
Bacevich said the “military mind-set” has so infected the discourse of the power elite that when there is a foreign policy problem the usual response is to discuss “three different courses of military action. ... Should it be airstrikes with drones? Should it be airstrikes with manned aircraft? Special operations forces? Or some combination of all three? And that’s what you get.” The press, he said, is an “echo chamber and reinforces the notion that those are the [only] options.”
The disintegration of Iraq is irreversible. At best, the Kurds, the Shiites and the Sunnis will carve out antagonistic enclaves. At worst, there will be a protracted civil war. This is what we have bequeathed to Iraq. The spread of our military through the region has inflamed jihadists across the Arab world. The resulting conflicts will continue until we end our occupation of the Middle East. The callous slaughter we deliver is no different from the callous slaughter we receive. Our jihadists—George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Thomas Friedman and Tommy Franks—who assured us that swift and overwhelming force in Iraq would transform the Middle East into an American outpost of progress, are no less demented than the jihadists approaching Baghdad. These two groups of killers mirror each other. This is what we have spawned. And this is what we deserve.
AP/Lefteris Pitarakis

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
Posted by markmarv2004 at 7:38 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Friday, April 4, 2014

PLUTOCRACY IN REAL LIFE; THE END OF DEMOCRACY?








  • previous
  • next
























 On Thursday morning, the Wall Street Journal runs an op-ed by one of the best-known mega-donors, Charles Koch, who with his brother backs Americans for Prosperity, which spent $122 million leading up to the 2012 campaign and has already spent more than $30 million in the past six months attacking Obamacare and Democratic senators up for reelection this fall. In the op-ed, Koch explains his heavy spending by warning of the “collectivists” threatening to take over the country. “The fundamental concepts of dignity, respect, equality before the law and personal freedom are under attack by the nation’s own government,” he writes.




* * * * * * * * * *



HMJ observes--

America appears to be transforming itself from a democracy to a plutocracy. Plutocracy, the dictionary
defines as, "a class or group ruling, or exercising power or influence, by virtue of its wealth." The most
recent ruling of the Supreme Court in expanding Citizens United with its newest decision in 
McCutcheon makes it possible for those with mega bucks to influence elections and national and state 
policy-making in ways the founding father would have never anticipated or thought possible. And these decisions are based on supporting Constitutional guarantees of free speech.  Use of money in contributing to a campaign has somehow come to equal speech just like the corporation now has come to have the same legal rights as a person. (Dartmouth, Citizens).

The Atlantic continues that:

"As the Court confidently declared, "We now conclude that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption." And for skeptics who thought otherwise, the Court provided this additional assurance: "The appearance of influence or access, furthermore, will not cause the electorate to lose faith in our democracy."  Oh dear. and I thought I was naive.

Most citizens are not surprised to learn that millionaires spend huge amounts of money to help candidates get elected because the donors expect a quid pro quo, something in return, to be rewarded by the winners in some way--a job, an appointment, favorable legislation, or elimination of regulations that limit exploitation of people or the environment, protection against immigrants or people whose views oppose or support certain "religiously based" ethical positions (abortion, capital punishment, welfare, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act, early education,) etc., etc).

The following article from the  The Atlantic hits on attitudes and circumstances in America that I deplore. Maybe it's because I'm an old guy and feel increasingly helpless as to do anything about the situation. I am not encouraged when I look around me for solutions among the' best and the brightest' in the next generations who ought to have the time and energy to pursue the remediation of these abuses.  Many of them seem to me to be focused on other irrelevant (lightweight) or purely selfish pursuits: texting, or "gaming" or hacking one system or another, clubbing,  job-jumping, or trying "to do deals" that will help them to become part of (as movers and shakers) the very system that needs fixing.

I am coming to believe that Chris Hedges is more than a little right when he says that the American democratic and economic system--as it is--will not and cannot self-correct, and that real change will come about only when the abuses become so egregious that a full scale revolution will be the only answer. As the realities of their circumstances continue to pound on the 99%, Hedges' revolution may not be  too far in the future.


BREAKDOWNAPRIL 3, 2014

This Is What Life in a Plutocracy Looks Like

BY ALEC MACGILLIS @AlecMacGillis
Here are six snapshots from this week in America:
1. On Sunday, billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson concludes the weekend summit at the Venetian in Las Vegas where four Republican presidential prospects for 2016 came to make their implicit pitch for financial support from the man who spentnearly $150 million during the 2012 campaign.
2. On Monday, a Senate subcommittee releases a report on the tax avoidance used by Caterpillar, the giant Peoria, Ill.-based heavy equipment manufacturer, which cut its tax bill by $2.4 billion over the past 13 years by allotting $8 billion in revenues from its parts division to a subsidiary in Switzerland, where only 65 of the division’s 8,500 employees work. In an email exchange about whether this was appropriate, a managing director at PricewaterhouseCoopers, which was paid $55 million to concoct this arrangement, said: “What the heck, we’ll all be retired when this audit comes up on audit…Baby boomers have their fun, and leave it to the kids to pay for it.”
3. On Tuesday, House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan releases the latest version of the famous Ryan budget. To make up for tax reductions for the wealthy, the budget calls for very deep cuts in spending on Medicaid, food stamps and discretionary spending, which includes research and development, transportation and infrastructure. Amtrak would lose its $1 billion in already-meager annual subsidies and have to rely entirely on fare-box revenue.
4. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court releases a 5-4 ruling in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, eliminating caps on how much total money ultra-rich donors can give to candidates, parties and PACs in a given election cycle. Where donors had previously been limited to giving $123,200 to candidates and parties in a given cycle, they can now give as much as $3.6 million. Chief Justice John Roberts writes: “Spending large sums of money in connection with elections, but not in connection with an effort to control the exercise of an officeholder’s official duties, does not give rise to quid pro quo corruption.” Celebrating the ruling, House Speaker John Boehnersays, “I’m all for freedom, congratulations.”
5. On Thursday morning, the Wall Street Journal runs an op-ed by one of the best-known mega-donors, Charles Koch, who with his brother backs Americans for Prosperity, which spent $122 million leading up to the 2012 campaign and has already spent more than $30 million in the past six months attacking Obamacare and Democratic senators up for reelection this fall. In the op-ed, Koch explains his heavy spending by warning of the “collectivists” threatening to take over the country. “The fundamental concepts of dignity, respect, equality before the law and personal freedom are under attack by the nation’s own government,” he writes.
6. Later on Thursday morning, between 9 and 10 a.m., part of the overhead electric line that powers the Acela train comes down onto the tracks near Bowie, Maryland, between Washington, D.C. and Baltimore. Virtually all train traffic between Baltimore and Washington shuts down for hours as undermanned crews struggle to repair the line, thereby severely hampering traffic in the Washington to Boston Northeast corridor that carries 750,000 passengers on 2,000 trains per day and also spelling panic for the Thursday afternoon rail commuters heading north out of Washington.
A southbound commuter train from Baltimore to Washington on Thursday morning that was caught just behind the downed lines and a stalled Acela takes four hours and 20 minutes to make the 40 mile journey, one that normally takes an hour. German tourists on the train sit bewildered about what could possibly be happening. Passengers have the consolation of listening to several proudly Republican lawyer/lobbyists on board loudly voicing their opinions on the delay. One declares it is the fault of President Obama, who is “in way over his head.” Another declares that the lack of credible information from the conductor is “just like Benghazi.”
One passenger is left thinking that this country could use some more spending on infrastructure, transportation and the general commonweal. Yes, that risks being “collectivist” and would be opposed by a casino magnate with vast holdings in Macau and would leave less for top-bracket tax cuts in the Ryan budget. But heck, it would also mean some more business for Caterpillar, which might even be prevailed upon to keep some of its income stateside, thus helping pay for said investment in the future of the greatest nation on earth.

Jen Sorensen by Jen Sorensen




Posted by markmarv2004 at 8:56 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Followers

About Me

My photo
markmarv2004
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (30)
    • ▼  November (1)
      • RAMPING UP TRUTH HUMOROUSLY
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2014 (16)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2013 (28)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (20)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (39)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (9)
Simple theme. Theme images by luoman. Powered by Blogger.